Compare

How Stack Almanac compares.

Stack Almanac is an AI-powered supplement advisory platform, not just a tracker. Here is how it compares to supplement tracking apps, quantified-self platforms, and AI recommendation engines.

What makes Stack Almanac different.

Advisor, not just a tracker

Most supplement apps let you log what you take and stop there. Stack Almanac is an AI advisor that actively analyses your data, identifies patterns, and recommends changes to your routine. Every conversation has full context: your supplements, consistency, outcomes, health data, interactions, bloodwork, and personal profile.

Personal insights that learn from your data

Stack Almanac compares your outcomes on days you take a supplement versus days you skip it. It uses three-state accuracy (confirmed, assumed, skipped) to prevent false patterns. Over time, it surfaces personal insights like "your sleep improves when you take magnesium glycinate", things no generic research study can tell you.

Personalised, not one-size-fits-all

Recommendations account for sex-specific dosing, menstrual cycle phase, genetic variants (MTHFR, COMT, VDR, APOE, CYP1A2), diet (vegan, keto), medication interactions, and your personal response data. The same supplement affects different people differently. Stack Almanac respects that.

Effortless tracking eliminates tracking fatigue

You don't check off supplements every day. Your regular supplements are assumed taken by default. You only log when something changes: a missed dose, a new supplement, or a different time. This three-state model (confirmed / assumed / skipped) makes tracking sustainable for months and years, not just the first enthusiastic week.

Track from messaging apps, not just a dedicated app

Log supplements, check your schedule, ask the AI advisor, and receive reminders via Telegram, WhatsApp, or SMS. No need to open a separate app. Effortless tracking works via messaging too. No reply means everything was taken on schedule.

Wearable data feeds your personal insights

Connect Apple Health, Oura Ring, Whoop, and other wearables. Steps, sleep hours, HRV, and resting heart rate feed directly into your personal insights and AI advisor. Quantified-self apps show you this data in isolation. Stack Almanac connects it to your supplement routine.

Feature-by-feature comparison.

Stack Almanac vs typical supplement trackers vs quantified-self platforms

Feature
Stack Almanac
Supplement trackers
Quantified-self apps
AI & Intelligence
Conversational AI supplement advisor
Personalised recommendations from your data
Limited
Bloodwork interpretation
Genetic variant awareness (MTHFR, COMT, etc.)
Natural language stack setup
Tracking & Logging
Exception-based logging (no daily checklists)
Three-state compliance (confirmed / assumed / skipped)
Supplement-specific tracking (forms, doses, timing)
Tags only
Track via messaging (Telegram, WhatsApp, SMS)
AI bottle scanner (photo identification)
Analytics & Correlation
Personal supplement insights
Basic
Supplement combination discovery
Cycle-phase insights
Daily Score (0-100)
Interaction database with evidence grades
Basic
Integrations & Data
Wearable sync (Apple Health, Oura, Whoop)
HRV, sleep, resting HR in correlation analysis
View only
Wide data source aggregation (50+ services)
Community stacks marketplace
Smart restock with price comparison
Bio-Individuality
Sex-specific dosing recommendations
Cycle-aware timing adjustments
Medication interaction checking
Timing intelligence (absorption, conflicts)
Diet-aware gap analysis

Detailed comparisons.

Stack Almanac vs general quantified-self apps (Exist.io, Gyroscope)

Quantified-self platforms like Exist.io aggregate data from dozens of sources (weather, music, location, fitness, mood) and find correlations between any of them. They are broad personal analytics hubs. Stack Almanac is narrower and deeper: it is purpose-built for supplement optimisation. Where a quantified-self app might tell you "you sleep better on days you walk more," Stack Almanac tells you which specific supplement, at which dose and timing, correlates with your sleep improvement, then recommends changes via an AI advisor that understands supplement interactions and your personal biology. If you want a general life-tracking dashboard, a quantified-self app is the right tool. If you want to know whether your supplements are actually working and how to improve, Stack Almanac is built for that specific problem.

Stack Almanac vs supplement tracking apps (Staqc, Supplements AI, Biohackr)

Supplement tracking apps focus on logging what you take. Some add barcode scanning, symptom timelines, or PubMed citations. Stack Almanac goes further with three key differences. First, the Almanac Advisor is a conversational AI that knows your entire routine, consistency history, bloodwork, and biology. It gives personalised guidance, not generic information. Second, personal insights use a three-state logging model (confirmed, assumed, skipped) to accurately measure whether supplements are working for you, including combination effects and cycle-phase patterns. Third, personalised recommendations account for sex, genetics, diet, medications, and your personal response patterns. Most trackers tell you what you took. Stack Almanac tells you what is working, what is not, and what to change.

Stack Almanac vs AI recommendation engines (myStack.ai)

AI recommendation engines suggest supplements based on clinical studies and your stated goals. Stack Almanac does this too, but adds a closed feedback loop. After you start taking a recommended supplement, your personal insights track whether it actually works for you, not just whether a study says it should. Your personal outcome data continuously refines future recommendations. The AI advisor follows up on its own suggestions, adjusting based on what your data shows over weeks and months.

Stack Almanac vs community-driven platforms (stackwise.bio)

Community platforms let you browse and share supplement routines. Stack Almanac includes a community routines marketplace where you can publish, clone, rate, and review routines, but the community layer sits on top of the AI advisor and personal insights. When you adopt a community routine, Stack Almanac tracks whether it works for your specific biology and suggests personalised modifications. Community wisdom plus personal data, not one or the other.

What data does Stack Almanac track?

Supplement data

  • Supplement name, brand, and specific form (e.g., magnesium glycinate vs citrate)
  • Dose amount and unit (mg, mcg, IU, ml)
  • Time blocks (morning, midday, evening, bedtime)
  • Compliance status: confirmed, assumed, or skipped
  • Skip reasons (ran out, stomach issues, forgot, intentional)
  • Supply level and restock alerts

Outcome metrics (daily self-report)

  • Energy level (1-5 scale)
  • Mood (1-5 scale)
  • Sleep quality (1-5 scale)
  • Focus and cognition (1-5 scale)
  • Stress level (1-5 scale)
  • Overall well-being (1-5 scale)

Health metrics (wearable sync)

  • Sleep hours (from Apple Health, Oura, Whoop)
  • Heart rate variability (HRV)
  • Resting heart rate
  • Daily steps
  • Menstrual cycle phase (for cycle-aware users)

Bio profile

  • Biological sex and age
  • Genetic variants (MTHFR, COMT, VDR, APOE, CYP1A2)
  • Diet type (omnivore, vegetarian, vegan, keto, etc.)
  • Current medications
  • Health goals and conditions
  • Bloodwork results (for AI interpretation)

How does Stack Almanac identify patterns?

Stack Almanac compares your self-reported outcomes and wearable health data on days you take a supplement versus days you skip it. Over time, this reveals which supplements actually correlate with improvements in your energy, sleep, mood, focus, and other metrics.

The system uses a three-state logging model. When you take your supplements as normal, they are marked as “assumed” automatically, so you do not need to confirm every dose. If you explicitly confirm a dose, it is weighted at 100% in the correlation analysis. Assumed doses are weighted at 50%, reducing their influence on results. Skipped doses are weighted at 100% on the “did not take” side. This prevents false correlations from lazy logging.

Beyond single supplements, the engine discovers combination effects, supplement pairs that correlate with better outcomes than either supplement alone. For users tracking menstrual cycles, it also runs cycle-phase correlations, comparing outcomes in the follicular phase versus the luteal phase for each supplement.

Minimum significance thresholds filter out noise. You need at least 14 days of data before the engine surfaces a correlation, and results are only shown when the statistical difference is meaningful. The AI advisor then interprets these correlations in the context of your full personal profile, explaining why a pattern might exist and suggesting changes to your routine.

See the difference for yourself.

Start your 21-day Pro trial. Full access to the AI advisor, personal insights, and personalised recommendations. No credit card required.